
Anti-curl operator - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Anti-curl operator Ask Question Asked 14 years, 3 months ago Modified 1 year, 7 months ago
Inverse of the curl - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Inverse of the curl Ask Question Asked 14 years, 4 months ago Modified 14 years, 4 months ago
multivariable calculus - How to find a vector potential (inverse curl ...
How to find a vector potential (inverse curl)? Ask Question Asked 13 years, 10 months ago Modified 13 years, 10 months ago
Un-curl operator? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
( ×F ) ⋅n = 1 ( → × F →) n → = 1 where n n → is the normal to the surface. How do I come up with a vector field, F F →, that satisfies this condition? I found a paper that discusses an inverse-curl …
What does the symbol nabla indicate? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Mar 27, 2018 · The wikipedia page for the nabla symbol covers those operators well, as do the other answers here. It's worth noting that when reading the symbol in the context of vector calculus, it is …
Intuition on the curl formula - Mathematics Stack Exchange
I suppose one normally does the reverse, that is, derive Stokes' theorem from the curl rather than the formula for curl from Stokes', but if you accept that Stokes' has been proved, then it shouldn't matter …
Relation between Curvature and Radius of Curvature
Jan 30, 2020 · Why is the radius of curvature the reciprocal of the curvature? How to see this intuitively as well show it rigorously?
what does ∇ (upside down triangle) symbol mean in this problem
Ok, so in this case the problem is a matter of taking the derivative with respect to x of the equation given?
Implication of divergence of a vector field is zero
Sep 7, 2020 · 2 I know that if the curl of a vector field is zero, then the vector field must be the gradient of a scalar field. But if the divergence of a vector field is zero, is it a must that the vector field be the …
The "inverse" of $\nabla\times$ operator - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Dec 2, 2015 · Therefore it should be impossible to "invert", as the curl only captures part of the vectors which is not part of the scalar potential. While an inverse therefore is impossible we can probably find …